<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a fam affair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/a-fam-affair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/a-fam-affair/</link>
	<description>mommy-wife-student-friend</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gradmommy</title>
		<link>http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/a-fam-affair/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>gradmommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/?p=183#comment-494</guid>
		<description>ah, i hear you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, i hear you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newsocprof</title>
		<link>http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/a-fam-affair/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>newsocprof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/?p=183#comment-493</guid>
		<description>sorry, i was anonymous above. my point is that i&#039;m really struck by the depth of the belief on this issue, not that practices were ahead of evidence (which, as you say, is totally unsurprising). i asked the head of parole for a state with a very large prison population about this (e.g., &quot;do you see any problems with family reintegration in every case? what are the risks? is it problematic to engage children in a project to reduce recidivism in their parents?&quot; etc). he replied with a pretty firm no to all of the above.

the part i am thinking a lot about now are the conflicts -- at the end of the day, the inmate is the client of the system, not the inmate&#039;s family, partner, or children. still, for someone like me who is resarching this, it&#039;s great to start with a system that believes in the importance of your research as access is certainly much easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, i was anonymous above. my point is that i&#8217;m really struck by the depth of the belief on this issue, not that practices were ahead of evidence (which, as you say, is totally unsurprising). i asked the head of parole for a state with a very large prison population about this (e.g., &#8220;do you see any problems with family reintegration in every case? what are the risks? is it problematic to engage children in a project to reduce recidivism in their parents?&#8221; etc). he replied with a pretty firm no to all of the above.</p>
<p>the part i am thinking a lot about now are the conflicts &#8212; at the end of the day, the inmate is the client of the system, not the inmate&#8217;s family, partner, or children. still, for someone like me who is resarching this, it&#8217;s great to start with a system that believes in the importance of your research as access is certainly much easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olderwoman</title>
		<link>http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/a-fam-affair/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>olderwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/?p=183#comment-492</guid>
		<description>This seems like a really important area to work in.  On both sides: family --&gt; deviance and deviance --&gt; family.  And the crime/criminal justice angle opens a lot of job possibilities, a non-trivial issue for a person with a family to support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a really important area to work in.  On both sides: family &#8211;&gt; deviance and deviance &#8211;&gt; family.  And the crime/criminal justice angle opens a lot of job possibilities, a non-trivial issue for a person with a family to support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gradmommy</title>
		<link>http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/a-fam-affair/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>gradmommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/?p=183#comment-491</guid>
		<description>right - that&#039;s what I&#039;m thinking as well. But that&#039;s always the case in policy - there are very few evidence-based practices out there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>right &#8211; that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m thinking as well. But that&#8217;s always the case in policy &#8211; there are very few evidence-based practices out there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/a-fam-affair/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gradmommy.wordpress.com/?p=183#comment-490</guid>
		<description>interesting questions... i spend most of my work life thinking about this and re: reentry, i find myself a bit conflicted. the number of reentry and prison programs focusing on family have gone up quite a lot and those i know in corrections believe family is key to reducing recidivism. the problem is... they think that is that it is case for EVERYONE and you don&#039;t hear a lot of nuance in the argument in practice. in my own work, i find a subset of cases where this is disatrous (for example, when there is a history of domestic violence between mom and dad or when parenting responsibilities add strain to an already taxed ex-inmate and leads to more crime). it&#039;s really complicated and my own reading of the literature is that practices on the ground are way ahead of the research, for good or for ill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting questions&#8230; i spend most of my work life thinking about this and re: reentry, i find myself a bit conflicted. the number of reentry and prison programs focusing on family have gone up quite a lot and those i know in corrections believe family is key to reducing recidivism. the problem is&#8230; they think that is that it is case for EVERYONE and you don&#8217;t hear a lot of nuance in the argument in practice. in my own work, i find a subset of cases where this is disatrous (for example, when there is a history of domestic violence between mom and dad or when parenting responsibilities add strain to an already taxed ex-inmate and leads to more crime). it&#8217;s really complicated and my own reading of the literature is that practices on the ground are way ahead of the research, for good or for ill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
